Cycle 1 Application Deadline: April 27, 2026

PJM Interconnection
Site Control Compliance

FERC Order 2023 introduced graduated site control thresholds for PJM's new cycle-based queue. Here's everything you need to submit a deficiency-free Cycle 1 application and maintain compliance through GIA execution.

PJM Site Control Thresholds by Stage

Under FERC Order 2023, PJM requires increasing site control coverage at each queue milestone. Options count at full weight (1.0) through Facilities Study but are excluded at IA execution.

Queue Stage Coverage Threshold Options Allowed Option Weight Encumbrance Policy
Pre-application0%Yes1.0Allow
Application50%Yes1.0Flag
Feasibility Study50%Yes1.0Flag
System Impact Study90%Yes1.0Disqualify
Facilities Study90%Yes1.0Disqualify
IA Execution100%No0.0Disqualify
Commercial Operation100%No0.0Disqualify

Eligible instruments at IA execution: fee simple, executed lease, easement, ROW agreement. Source: PJM Manual M-3.1S, FERC Order 2023 compliance filing.

For the full cross-RTO comparison, see FERC Order 2023 Thresholds by RTO and Stage.

What Changed for PJM Under FERC Order 2023

Before: Serial Queue

  • • One threshold at one milestone
  • • 2,600+ projects backlogged in queue
  • • No formal readiness deposit requirement
  • • Speculative projects clogged the system
  • • Average 5+ year wait for interconnection

After: Cycle-Based Queue

  • Graduated thresholds — 50% at application, 90% at SIS, 100% at IA
  • Readiness deposits — $4K/MW (up to $2M) prove commitment
  • Study deposits — tiered by MW, due at application
  • Decision Points — withdraw-or-proceed gates at each phase
  • Withdrawal penalties — 100% of study deposit + assigned upgrade costs

PJM Cycle 1 Key Deadlines

Apr 27, 2026

Application Window Closes

Study deposit + readiness deposit + 50% site control required

~Q3 2026

Cluster Study Begins

Feasibility + System Impact studies run in parallel for the cluster

~Q1 2027

Decision Point 1

Proceed or withdraw. 90% site control required for SIS phase

~Q3 2027

Decision Point 2

Facilities study allocation. Network upgrade cost assignments begin

~2028

IA Execution

100% site control with executed instruments only — no options

PJM Cycle 1 Resources

Common PJM Site Control Risks

Options Expire Before IA Execution

Pre-Order 2023 options are running into post-Order 2023 milestones. If your option expires before IA execution, you lose coverage on those parcels — and options are excluded entirely at 100% threshold. Land teams need 12+ months lead time to negotiate lease conversions.

Encumbrances Disqualify Coverage at SIS

PJM flags encumbrances at application but disqualifies them from System Impact Study onward. Mortgages, liens, and conservation easements on leased parcels can silently drop your coverage from 90% to below threshold. SNDA agreements are the standard cure.

Withdrawal Penalties Are Non-Trivial

Post-Decision Point 1, withdrawing means forfeiting your entire study deposit plus a share of assigned network upgrade costs. For a 200 MW project with $50M in upgrades, that's $500K+ in study deposits plus potentially millions in upgrade cost allocation.

Multi-State Permitting Timelines

PJM spans 13 states plus DC. State permitting timelines range from 75 days (Illinois county-level) to 388 days (Maryland PSC). A site control package that passes PJM review can still stall if state permits aren't aligned with queue milestones.

Automate PJM Site Control Compliance

Zonevex parses your lease PDFs, matches parcels to the project boundary, applies PJM's stage-specific thresholds, and tells you exactly where your coverage stands — before you file.

50%

Application threshold

90%

SIS threshold

100%

IA execution

5

Audit filters

Official PJM Resources